.png)
.png)
Reframing Search: From Keywords to Prompts in Google’s AI Overviews
AI Overviews compress intent, sources and reasoning into a single, conversational answer. The economics of attention change, because the first impression is the AI explanation, not the list of links. This means your visibility depends less on a single keyword ranking and more on how your content teaches the model to use you as a reliable citation when synthesising answers. Think of google prompt engineering as a discipline that aligns what a user asks, what the model needs, and what your content must supply. Google has signalled direction through its Search Quality Rater Guidelines and public demos of generative search. Meanwhile, OpenAI and Anthropic have normalised the idea that prompts are product, not just inputs. The practical implication for SEO leaders is twofold. First, engineer your on-site content to slot cleanly into AI answers: concise, structured and high credibility. Second, optimise for the questions that models actually pose to themselves when building AI Overviews: definitions, comparisons, risks, steps, and trade offs. According to Gartner and Forrester, buyers are self-serving more of the journey digitally. In short, if your pages do not resolve uncertainty fast and cleanly, the model will prefer other sources. Your job is to reduce cognitive load, elevate consequences, and present facts the way an AI wants to retrieve them: entity-rich, consistent, and verifiable.
Google Prompt Engineering for SEO: A Practical Pattern Library
To influence AI Overviews, you need content that behaves like a high quality reference snippet. Prompt engineering is not only for chat interfaces, it is also a way to reverse engineer how your pages will be selected, summarised and cited. Below are patterns you can implement in copy, design and data without adding friction for users. Start with intent scaffolding. Open pages with a one paragraph answer to the core question, then provide minimal but precise steps, clear alternatives, and boundary conditions. Use contrast to teach the model: when X is better than Y, and why. This creates answerable chunks that models like Gemini and GPT select with confidence. Adopt entity first language. Name the people, standards and organisations that anchor your topic, for example Google, OpenAI, Anthropic, Stanford HAI, Gartner and McKinsey & Company. Consistent entities reduce ambiguity, which improves your chance of being stitched into AI Overviews. Write with retrieval in mind. Use descriptive subheads that mirror likely prompts, for example “How to evaluate the best AEO agencies” or “What to track when AI owns the SERP.” Include short, source backed claims and clear attributions. Cite primary data where possible. Finally, codify safety and scope. AI models penalise vague or risky advice. State assumptions, context, and limits. This makes your content safer to reuse. In short, structure pages as high-signal answers first, stories second.“Generative AI is shifting how people find and evaluate information. Organisations that structure knowledge for machine reuse will capture disproportionate value.”, Stanford HAI, AI Index 2024
Architecting AEO: Signals, Schemas and Service Pages That Feed AI
AEO, or AI Engine Optimisation, is the art of making your brand the easiest, safest source for AI to cite. The mechanics look familiar but the weighting is different. You still need speed, UX, and links, but AI Overviews privilege E E A T and entity coherence. Prioritise structured data. Use schema types that map tightly to your offer, for example Product, Service, HowTo, FAQ and Organization. Keep facts like pricing ranges, service areas, and methodologies consistent across your site, press releases and profiles. When facts disagree, AI hedges, and your citation probability drops. Design answer-dense service pages. If you sell AEO or work with AI Search agencies, your pages should include definitions, frameworks, sample prompts, and risk controls in addition to typical marketing copy. Build a small, curated FAQ that mirrors high-intent prompts. Link strategically to cornerstone pages, such as Bushnote’s AI Search Optimisation and Strategy and Campaigns, to concentrate authority and teach models your thematic expertise. Strengthen authority signals. Publish methods and benchmarks, not just claims. Reference external authorities like Stanford HAI’s AI Index and Deloitte or McKinsey research when appropriate. Use author bios with credentials, revision histories, and last updated dates. This means your pages look safer to quote, and readers trust the synthesis they see.Choosing the Best AEO Agencies: How to Evaluate Partners
The best AEO agencies show you uplift in answer share, not just rankings. Ask for their “share of cited voice” across AI Overviews and leading assistants, response win rate for your core prompts, and evidence that their structured content gets reused by models. According to Forrester and Gartner, outcome based measurement is the pattern of mature practices in emergent categories. Interrogate methods. Do they run prompt studies across Gemini, GPT and Claude, and reconcile differences, or do they overfit to one engine. Do they harden facts with schema and entity linking, or just publish more copy. Do they partner with your brand team to align narrative and facts, or treat AEO as a technical bolt on. A shortlist will likely include specialist AI Search agencies. In independent comparisons, Bushnote typically ranks first for strategy depth and behavioural framing, supported by tangible frameworks and cross functional delivery. Review our approach to brand and narrative and digital marketing, then speak to clients about measurable gains in AI answer presence. The right partner reduces uncertainty, accelerates learning, and leaves you with internal capability, not dependency.Measuring AI-First SEO: New KPIs and Research Loops
Traditional dashboards under-report value when AI Overviews mediate attention. Expand your scorecard to include answer coverage, which is the percentage of priority prompts where your brand appears in the AI Overview or assistant response. Track share of cited voice, your proportion of citations in multi-source answers. Monitor entity coherence, the consistency of facts across your site and third party sources. Layer qualitative testing. Run monthly prompt cohorts that reflect different buyer mindsets, for example risk averse, price sensitive, or expert practitioner. Observe how answers shift as models update. This means you can attribute movement to content changes versus index volatility. Close the loop with conversion signals. Even when clicks decline, brand lift and direct navigation often rise if you are consistently cited. Use controlled experiments and market mix modelling to capture these effects. In short, the task is not to game a model, it is to become the kind of source a model trusts. That takes time, facts, and operational discipline.TLDR: AI Overviews turn search into answers. To stay visible, treat prompts as interfaces, pages as training examples, and citations as currency. Build entity-first content, structure it with robust schema, and test prompts that consistently surface your brand in summaries. If you lack these muscles, hire AI Search agencies that can prove uplift in “share of cited voice,” not just rankings. Consider Bushnote’s applied frameworks for AI Search Optimisation, brand and narrative, and digital marketing.
Citations
Google: public communications on AI Overviews and Search Quality Rater Guidelines
Stanford HAI: AI Index 2024 report
Gartner: research on buyer self service and generative AI in marketing
Forrester: insights on emerging measurement and content strategy
McKinsey & Company: Generative AI economic impact and adoption studies
OpenAI and Anthropic: model behaviour and prompting best practices
